Notices
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 46 of 46

Thread: Anna Von Reitz posts on the truth of 'legal' issues

  1. #41 Domicile -- The Governing Issue — by Anna Von Reitz 
    "What advantage does a proper declaration of domicile provide you?

    It means you have to be tried under the Public Law, not private international commercial law. It means that there is no such thing as a "thought crime" or a "victimless crime" or a "statutory infringement". It means that you retain the full roster of trial options set forth in Blackstone's Commentaries, including "Trial by Record"--- which, if you have done your homework, will more than adequately prove that you are an American and that you are properly domiciled on the land and soil of your birth state.

    That cuts you free of their municipal law, and it also demands that instead of being treated under their territorial law, you are owed The Law of Peace from their military courts, as a Third Party Civilian Non-Combatant having nothing to do with their internecine power struggles and con games.

    If you have not actually and factually harmed someone who is bringing complaint or stolen or damaged someone else's property by your direct actions for which a complaining party appears --- there is no case, no prevailing law, and no presumable jurisdiction for THEM to operate it."

    Domicile -- The Governing Issue — by Anna Von Reitz

    http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/06/d...ing-issue.html


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #42 Agencies Are the "Shadow Government" -- Worldwide — by Anna Von Reitz 
    Along with all the other ignorant and/or self-interested frou-frou-rah going on there is a lot of paranoid talk about "the Shadow Government". I can assure you it is not a shadow and not a mystery, either.

    Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a King Rat who garnered more than 350 new "powers" for the corporate presidential office -- powers never granted to Congress and certainly never granted to the actual Presidential Office, either --- but usurped under the pretenses of a foreign, for-profit corporation's internal administration while providing "governmental services" under contract.

    This goes back to the issue of capacities. FDR never had the capacity as President of The United States of America to do or claim 95% of what he did, so he simply didn't occupy the actual Constitutional Office owed to the American States and People.

    Similar to the Queen of England faking everyone out and occupying The Chair of the Estates instead of the Throne, FDR didn't act as our President, but occupied "other" Presidential capacities as the CEO of the Territorial and Municipal corporations, instead, and used those offices to usurp power and make changes to the structure of the corporations providing us with all these "services".

    This had the effect of changing (profoundly) the structure of what appeared to be our government, but which was in fact simply a foreign corporation in the business of providing "governmental services" on a contractual basis.
    Agencies Are the "Shadow Government" -- Worldwide — by Anna Von Reitz

    http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/07/a...worldwide.html



    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #43 Self-Governing — by Anna Von Reitz 
    When I was about fifteen and full of beans and would do something a bit rash or get above myself in making comments to adults, my Mother would wag her head and say, “If you don’t govern yourself, someone else will have to do it for you! And it will be at your cost!”

    What she meant by this was not totally, crystal clear to me at the time, but it has become one of those nagging mantras that expands and clarifies its meaning over the rough road of experience and time.

    Like all great truths, it’s deceptively simple. We have to self-discipline ourselves and choose what is right, or we run the risk of having other parties and powers come into our lives to do the job we have avoided doing for ourselves.

    For me as a young girl, it had more to do with minding my tongue and being patient.
    For many people, failing to self-govern means landing in jail.

    For a nation, it is the fundamental requirement of existence.
    Self-Governing — by Anna Von Reitz

    http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/07/self-governing.html


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #44 One Page Situation Update for August 8, 2018 — by Anna Von Reitz 
    The Current System:

    • · A Scottish corporation calling itself “The United States of America, Inc.” and a Delaware corporation calling itself the “United States of America, Inc.” run by the Roman Catholic Church have been usurping upon our Government.... since 1868;
    • · They have provided the 19 enumerated services required by the original Constitution –and a lot more we never asked for --under fraudulently assumed contracts;
    • · The labor of the American People and their other assets have been used as tradable commodities to pay for all these services;
    • · Our legal system was unlawfully converted into a private debt collection service to seize our assets to pay for all this foreign spending on our tickets;
    • · Bottom line: we have been defrauded and enslaved in gross Breach of Trust. The purported Trustees have stolen our individual identities and racked up huge bills against our credit— just like any credit card thief.
    Read on for The Correction to Be Made: and Where We Are Going:

    One Page Situation Update for August 8, 2018
    — by Anna Von Reitz

    http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/08/o...-august-8.html


    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #45 Basics of Birth Certificates — by Anna Von Reitz 
    I have been asked and asked about Birth Certificates--- what are they? Why do we have one? Much less two?

    You are given a "certificate" in exchange for "registering" something.

    When you register a piece of property --- say, a car or truck? Or a name? --- you give up your ownership interest in it and pass the ownership interest on to the "entity" that you register it with.

    So, when your Mother is subtly misinformed and coerced to register her new possession --- you ---- with the corporation posing as your government, guess what?

    You get a "birth certificate" for the same reason you get a car registration. It's a historical document memorializing the event and identifying the property that changed hands, in the event that anyone needs to know the details later on.

    This is how the British-backed Territorial Corporation known as the "State of Florida" or "State of Maine" or "State of Texas"...... picked up an ownership interest in "you" and "your name" ---- converted your identity from that of a living man or woman, and gained the right (by your Mother's mistake and your later silence) to consider you a "franchise" of their corporation and chattel backing their debts.
    Basics of Birth Certificates — by Anna Von Reitz

    http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/08/b...tificates.html
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #46 The "Historic" Trusts — by Anna Von Reitz 
    The banks did something deplorable, criminal, inexcusable.

    It wasn't the first time.

    They pretended that actual assets left "on Special Deposit" in their banks were "abandoned" simply because nobody had used or inquired about the assets in a long time.

    Of course, there was no contractual obligation on the part of the Depositors to meet any schedule of contact with the bank, but the banks acted upon the theory that if Depositors didn't walk through the doors as often as they or someone in the Legislature thought they should---- well, of course, those assets had to be "abandoned", "lost", "unclaimed".

    It's basically the same schtick they have applied to all the "missing" American babies who were born on our shores and who magically "disappeared" (on paper) and whose good names and estates were then labelled "Disregarded entities" for the purposes of fraud, racketeering, and theft.

    After cobbling up this after-the fact requirement, which was never disclosed to the Depositors, the banks then seized those private account assets for the bank's use, and the bank gambled with those assets and made use of these private deposits to underwrite lending, which the bank multiplied according to the rules of "fractional reserve" banking --- thus benefiting itself many times over with no risk or expense for itself and no consideration for the actual owners of the assets.

    All of this took place with no notice given to the actual owners.
    The "Historic" Trusts — by Anna Von Reitz

    http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/10/t...ic-trusts.html



    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •